Sounds like contradiction to me

[addlet]

In the PDFs that came with the TOP1 program you say that using automatic submission software is not good cause it leaves a footprint. Think you said that you might get ranked but the rankings wont stick.

Then somewhere else you talk about using Traffic Geyser.... which not only submits to video sites but to social bookmarking sites as well. And today I receive an email where you are promoting an automatic article submitter software.

So which is it?

Also, is it better to use different Social Bookmarking accounts for different campaigns or is it considered more natural to have a multitude of bookmarks for different sites in different niches maybe?

Thanks
Look forward to the response

[Tim Buchalka]

In the PDFs that came with the TOP1 program you say that using automatic submission software is not good cause it leaves a footprint. Think you said that you might get ranked but the rankings wont stick.

Then somewhere else you talk about using Traffic Geyser.... which not only submits to video sites but to social bookmarking sites as well. And today I receive an email where you are promoting an automatic article submitter software.

So which is it?

Also, is it better to use different Social Bookmarking accounts for different campaigns or is it considered more natural to have a multitude of bookmarks for different sites in different niches maybe?

Thanks
Look forward to the response

Good question! If I had a gold star option on the forum, I'd award one to you right now.

Firstly, I assume you are talking about this article submitter which we mailed out about recently?

Assuming that is the case, let me clarify and say MOST article submission software is fundamentally flawed as it submits the EXACT SAME copy of the article, title, and resource box to EVERY SITE leaving a footprint the size of (** insert reference to something huge here **)

The exact same article linking to the exact same page with the same title, etc is such a huge footprint that it's no wonder google and other search engines will discard many, most or even ALL of these articles, meaning you effectively just waste you time (and money) using them.

The best automatic article submitter package submits a random copy of your article with a random title, and a random resource box with random anchor text and random url's meaning each and every article will be considered unique.

Of course you do not HAVE to use this functionality. For example you could always use the same anchor text or the same links if you choose. But it's a lot smarter to mix it up (say use a random keyword phrase you are looking to rank for and to link to the home page and the actual post, etc).

That way the search engines see a pile of links from unique content with different anchor text going to different url's.

End result? Ranking much much better!

This is spinning your content. Some other submitters do some of this, but not to the level that this package does. I should know as I've played with most of them.

Also the account creation/automatic verification of email feature blew me away when I first saw it.

In the training videos which we are giving away as a bonus, I should you exactly how to make your title, article, resource box, and anchor text/url random. It's quite straight forward to do.

Hopefully this explains why we are so pumped about this package. I just got off Google chat with Milan the author earlier today and he tells me he has some other cool upgrades in the works.

Remember it also submits to your own Wordpress blogs and web 2.0 blogs like blogger.com and wordpress.com sites as well

Regarding your social bookmarking query, there is no single response here, I've seen either approach work. In theory you could say using the same social bookmarking accounts for multiple niches would be more natural since that is most likely what a "normal" non marketer would use it for (for all their bookmarks).

Either approach works, so I suspect it's more personal preference.

Regards


Tim

[addlet]

Well then what about Traffic Geyser? you were suggesting that software in the quick start guide. Traffic Geyser submits not only to traffic sites but other sites in bulk as well.

[Tim Buchalka]

Well then what about Traffic Geyser? you were suggesting that software in the quick start guide. Traffic Geyser submits not only to traffic sites but other sites in bulk as well.

Traffic Geyser is not mentioned in the quick start guide at all. Where did you you see this?

In any event, Traffic geyser works ok for submission (or used to) but has not got strong spinning but tries to overcome this by submitting the same video in different formats. I seem to remember it also allowed you to enter multiple titles and descriptions but this is not the same or anywhere near as powerful as true spinning, so generally I would not recommend it.

Let me know if anything is unclear.

Cheers


Tim

[addlet]

I apologise. Though I did see it in one of the PDFs

[addlet]

It was actually in the Web Traffic Magnet PDF.

There is one thing I would like some clarity on.
If you have a site about real estate and you have other sites
about real estate, or even say a legal firm site linking to it, then that would
be seen as a vote of confidence for your site.

Because most likely somewhere in the legal website, it will contain such
keywords as 'contract' 'assets' transactions' 'clients' 'investment' etc. keywords
or keyword phrases that are also found somewhere on your site.

Whereas if you were to have a website about pink fluffy ballet tutus linking
to your website about real estate then it is very unlikely that it will contain
any keywords or keyword phrases that are common to your real estate site,
thus the link would not hold much credence as far as the search engines are concerned.

Is this correct?

Also I made a post titled TOP 1 Benchmark.

I had a reply to that post which went on about depth of page rank etc etc. you will see it if you read the post.

I wondered what was your take on that please?

Thanks, I look forward to your reply.

Kindest regards

[Tim Buchalka]

It was actually in the Web Traffic Magnet PDF.

Ahh right, ok. Yes there is a reference in there, but it goes on to mention you study our other modules for more info and that is still my recommendation. I will update that web traffic book to make it clearer though so thanks for the heads up.

With so much info, sometimes stuff gets buried

There is one thing I would like some clarity on.
If you have a site about real estate and you have other sites
about real estate, or even say a legal firm site linking to it, then that would
be seen as a vote of confidence for your site.

Because most likely somewhere in the legal website, it will contain such
keywords as 'contract' 'assets' transactions' 'clients' 'investment' etc. keywords
or keyword phrases that are also found somewhere on your site.

Whereas if you were to have a website about pink fluffy ballet tutus linking
to your website about real estate then it is very unlikely that it will contain
any keywords or keyword phrases that are common to your real estate site,
thus the link would not hold much credence as far as the search engines are concerned.

Is this correct?

Also I made a post titled TOP 1 Benchmark.

I had a reply to that post which went on about depth of page rank etc etc. you will see it if you read the post.

I wondered what was your take on that please?

Thanks, I look forward to your reply.

Kindest regards

I see where you are going with the "related content" stuff, and yes I absolutely recommend this where possible but not necessarily for the search engines, more so for human visitors.

For example, the 1waylink service does NOT have categories to post your content in, yet it still helps your content rank tremendously which really confirms that the search engines are maybe not so strong on this.

If you think about it, if that was the case social bookmarking would not work at all because many social bookmarking accounts have links from a variety of niches, etc linking to content.

The real issue is authority sites. Finding links from sites that google think are authoritative sites is one of the best way to get your links ranking well, and more so if that authoritative site is in the same general niche as your site.

Regarding the other post, please post the url in here and I'll take a look.

Cheers


Tim

[addlet]

Hey Tim

Thanks for your reply. I have to say that part of the attraction to the TOP1 program was the fact that you are located in Oz. Beautiful downtown Melbourne even. I did join Howie Shwartz Conversation Domination as it is along similar lines. However I found the content ambiguous, and their support was woeful.

Anyway, that url is:
TOP1 Benchmark

Thanks.

[Tim Buchalka]

Hey Tim

Thanks for your reply. I have to say that part of the attraction to the TOP1 program was the fact that you are located in Oz. Beautiful downtown Melbourne even. I did join Howie Shwartz Conversation Domination as it is along similar lines. However I found the content ambiguous, and their support was woeful.

Anyway, that url is:
TOP1 Benchmark

One of the first programs I got into was "conversation domination". What I found was a lot of the content was user generated which made me think what was I paying for? I paid $1500 at the time for access. Still I learned a lot of stuff from Howie.

Appreciate the comments. I am in Adelaide actually, but Anthony is in Melbourne!

Cheers.

[hambone]

It was actually in the Web Traffic Magnet PDF.

There is one thing I would like some clarity on.
If you have a site about real estate and you have other sites
about real estate, or even say a legal firm site linking to it, then that would
be seen as a vote of confidence for your site.

Because most likely somewhere in the legal website, it will contain such
keywords as 'contract' 'assets' transactions' 'clients' 'investment' etc. keywords
or keyword phrases that are also found somewhere on your site.

Whereas if you were to have a website about pink fluffy ballet tutus linking
to your website about real estate then it is very unlikely that it will contain
any keywords or keyword phrases that are common to your real estate site,
thus the link would not hold much credence as far as the search engines are concerned.

Is this correct?

Also I made a post titled TOP 1 Benchmark.

I had a reply to that post which went on about depth of page rank etc etc. you will see it if you read the post.

I wondered what was your take on that please?

Thanks, I look forward to your reply.

Kindest regards

Content on the URL doesn't matter whatsoever, so long as there is content. The only things that matter are the perceived authority of the site (age,PR,etc), legitimacy of the site in general, and the text in your anchor link. I would take an anchor text link from a page about pink tutus to my real estate site in a heartbeat so long as it wasn't a hovel and had authority.